Talk:Made in Italy
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Reads like rubbish[edit]
The article is badly written. It is also blatantly promotional. Suggest removal or complete rewriting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.32.7 (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- I disagree with what I consider a mere point of view. This article seems supported by reliable sources and is structured like other articles who have a specific country of origin as main object.--93.32.149.250 (talk) 16:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- I would agree that the article in the current shape is actually misleading. Purple AK (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
You think it's well written do you? METRANGOLO1 (talk) 17:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Made in Italy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140324172136/http://www.onlyitaly.it/stampa/fortis/fortis_15.pdf to http://www.onlyitaly.it/stampa/fortis/fortis_15.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150217050703/http://www.agnona.com/en/storia/la-filosofia-del-lusso-intrinseco.php to http://www.agnona.com/en/storia/la-filosofia-del-lusso-intrinseco.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)