Talk:Lucius Aurelius Avianius Symmachus

A fact from Lucius Aurelius Avianius Symmachus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,812 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that enraged plebs burned down the home of Lucius Aurelius Avianius Symmachus because of a rumor that he would rather slake lime with wine, than sell wine at the price they wanted?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/November.

Wikipedia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

This article makes no sense whatsoever. How could people be punished in 376 for having burned a house in 377??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.0.60.22 (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering that too.--Jackyd101 (talk) 09:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, it was 367, not 377 (see Richardson p. 135). --TakenakaN (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]