This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
@Femkemilene: Thank you for cleaning up another article on an academic - Somdip Dey. Since, I have used similar format to also write this article, especially the Publications' section, will it be possible to review the section to maintain a neutral voice (and remove any promotional content)?
I am a moderately new editor and thank you for helping me clean up the articles.IMLone wolf (talk) 17:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Writing neutrally about things you feel positive about is difficult (and I would recommend new users start by improving articles about topics they do not feel passionate about).
The article also uses Google Scholar results wrong. You typically want to stay away from auto-generated statistics, and instead rely on WP:secondary sources. There are a few reasons you can't use GS like that:
It only indexes academics with a Google Scholar account
It only looks at specific keywords, whereas the field may have synonyms. (For instance, I'm the only one who uses the term variable renewables as an expertise [1], but I'm not a top-cited expert on this topic by far)
Most academics publish among multiple disciplines (going back to the above example, I've not yet published my first paper on variable renewables, so those 150 cites are completely irrelevant here. Femke (talk) 07:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Femke: Thank you for cleaning up the article and for the knowledge. IMLone wolf (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
