Talk:Little Joe (rocket)

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry Low‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Each of the Little Joe Rocket Stubs has just way to little information for them to be individual pages. It appears to be more efficient to just merge them into one page.--aceslead 20:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely agree.[edit]

Caitifty 18:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

merging[edit]

I don't think merging the articles is a good idea. Each is unique and has the potential to be expanded. --Ted-m 15:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also oppose merging the articles, because they can be expanded.Chris H 19:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Oppose" each mission was unique with various spacecraft and boilerplate (rocketry) tests, launch escape system, and rocket engine tests. I propose someone could do a draft layout of a merged article in this Talk area or a subpage without loosing data/info/refs... maybe a compromise could be reached. LanceBarber 18:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Little Joe (rocket). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://web.mac.com/jimgerard/AFGAS/pages/booster/lj1-arpwr.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060117204024/http://www.rocket.aero/littlejoe.html to http://www.rocket.aero/littlejoe.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]