Talk:List of visionary tall buildings and structures

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:CrystalIslandFoster.jpg[edit]

The image File:CrystalIslandFoster.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:29, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't think of a good reason for that image to be in this article, especially as the project is not mentioned in the body of the article at all. Removed. Astronaut (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Errors[edit]

Sapporo TV Tower is a bad link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.129.210.2 (talk) 13:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formatted to table[edit]

I have translated the page's key contents into relevant tables, post here with any problems or comments regarding this. Newsburst (talk) 16:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The table is currently in very poor form. Too much empty space. I suggest having only two columns. The first column for all the bite sized info (name, floors, year of projected completion, etc) and the second column for the long descriptions.68.147.216.129 (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)BrianPansky (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

section Structures[edit]

Is there a better layout for this information than a table? The current table is pathologically unbalanced; one column, the last one, contains much more content than any of the other eight columns, so much so that every table row becomes extremely tall just to accomodate that ninth column. This is terribly wasteful of screen space. At the moment I have a 1000-pixel browser window showing the middle of that table, and no text at all is visible in any of those first eight columns, just empty space, while the ninth column forms a narrow strip filled with text from top to bottom. Any suggestions of a better format?  Unician ∇  05:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see my suggstion in the Formatting section above. The table should only have two columns (though I suppose it could be three columns, with the first column being a list of the categories on information that will appear in the second column, and the third column just being the huge long descriptions).BrianPansky (talk) 21:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

megapower tower at 5000 mtrs?[edit]

shouldn't we add the 1990's Dutch megapower tower idea. That should have been around 5000 mtrs tall [[1]]. Arnoutf (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can we be realistic now?[edit]

who really believes that the Obayashi Corporation is being true when they state that they plan to build a space elevator in 2050? We all know that this is a publicity stunt. I think that the year should be changed to "undetermined" EggsInMyPockets (talk) 06:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Proposed tall buildings and structures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested change of article name[edit]

This article should be renamed to something like 'Visionary Buildings' and should not replicate any entries in List of future tallest buildings article. The terms 'Proposed' and 'under construction' have specific meanings according to the CTBUH (the leading authority of tall structures and buildings). Comments? Robynthehode (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is Arconic tower?[edit]

Where is Arconic tower? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ysku (talk • contribs) 13:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_visionary_tall_buildings_and_structures&oldid=1214527177"