Talk:List of sequenced plant genomes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

New entry[edit]

The genome of Klebsormidium flaccidum, a green algae, was published by Hori et al. in 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.30.70.167 (talk) 14:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assembly status?[edit]

Can we assign a status to these genomes such as survey, draft, finished, etc.? There is a paper describing how the categories can be assigned. It would be useful to see, for example, a chain of publications improving a given assembly. --Dan Bolser (talk) 10:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a relevant reference (and references therein): http://www.sciencemag.org/content/326/5950/236.short --Dan Bolser (talk) 11:23, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan: definitely useful, but I think apart from very few plant examples most genomes are in a draft state of one class or another. (or worse) I wouldn't want to lean so much out of the window to call the difference between High-Qual and improved high-qual draft. I reckon you can do this for potato? --Usadel (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resources to mine for sequenced genomes[edit]

Just making a list for my own reference:

https://arabidopsis.org/portals/genAnnotation/other_genomes/index.jsp
http://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php/Plant_Genome_Statistics
http://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php/Sequenced_plant_genomes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Bolser (talk • contribs) 11:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of sequenced plant genomes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://genomics.msu.edu/galdieria/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130628071728/http://www.amborella.org/ to http://www.amborella.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Published review[edit]

A new review in Horticultural Research gives 180 species, which should be harmonized with this (increasingly unmanageable) list. [1] Agricolae (talk) 19:50, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]