Talk:List of generating stations in Ontario

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

So I went and created List of power generating stations in Ontario without realizing this list existed, silly me. However, I have not speedily deleted it because I wanted to coordinate some transfer of info to this list, and then redirect. Key items that I wish to transfer to/change this list:

  • Wesleyville Generating Station was a planned 2,000-megawatt oil-fired power plant, but was never completed due to the 1973 oil crisis. The original article was re-directed to my list after a PROD, as I had saved the info and transfered it.
  • Separately listing former/inactive generating stations (e.g. the coal plants, Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station, and Nuclear Power Demonstration)
  • Distinguishing co-generation stations. This provides the opportunity to state what they are co-generating for.
  • Adding some prose and notes, in line with MOS:LIST. Introductory prose can be expanded, a small bit of prose could be added to the beginning of each section (nuclear, thermal etc.), and notes could be added to some individual generating stations.

Please share your thoughts! --Natural RX 21:00, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete yours, and integrate it into this one yourself. "Power station" is not a common Canadian usage; the category names were imposed by British Wikipedians against the norms in the rest of the anglosphere; that term has other meanings in Canada - particularly substations but not them alone; a few powerhouses are called "power stations", but only very few. The normal Canadian term, found on the names of the various power plants, is "generating station", likewise on their corporate websites; you should do research both inside Wikipedia and out before presuming to start an article; how could you think that such an article didn't exist. Did you not think to look in the category on these (which is, gaaagh Category:Power stations in Ontario, as if it were Kent or Essex just because we used to be part of the Empire. Those categories need revisiting, so that the article titles are followed, instead of diktats from linguistic imperialists in the Old Country seeking to homogenize English in their own image/pretension. You created the bad title and the parallel article, just merge the damn thing and redirect your non-Canadian title to the proper Canadian term.Skookum1 (talk) 07:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of generating stations in Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on List of generating stations in Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information to be updated: Brampton plant (under Biomass heading)[edit]

The Brampton biomass plant was purchased by Emerald Energy From Waste in 2014 [1]. Furthermore, the capacity (power output) is now stated to be 9.31 [2]. 199.212.18.130 (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Ori 2020-Feb-12[reply]

hola my name is dora2607:FEA8:A35F:7D00:D400:74C7:5BB3:D24B (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

60%?[edit]

The statement that Nuclear plants provide 60% of Ontario's power seems to be at odds with the figures the article provides - which suggest it supplies well under half.

I also note that the source of this figure is the agency that provides nuclear power....

There might well be an explanation for this figure: perhaps other sources provide power intermittently - daily/ seasonal/ weather-related/as needed..., with capacity and provision thus not necessarily aligned. If so, this should probably be made clear. Or the statement should be removed. Malav71 (talk) 21:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]