Talk:List of Ulysses characters

Milly Bloom was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 February 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Ulysses characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters[edit]

A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Much too much of the article text is cut & paste from the student cheat sheet sources. Also, simply citing Gutenberg as a source is original research. It’s Bloom’s Day — can’t we do better by providing encyclopedic secondary sources? – S. Rich (talk) 04:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now, I'm not so sure about the copyvio problem. E.g., I don't know enough about the policy and how to check via WP tools. I hope other editors can help out. Thanks, – S. Rich (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]