Talk:List of Brazilian federative units by Human Development Index

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former FLCList of Brazilian federative units by Human Development Index is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 11, 2008Featured list candidateNot promoted
October 7, 2013Featured list candidateNot promoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 18, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Federal District is the Brazilian federative unit with the highest Human Development Index?
Current status: Former featured list candidate


About the merge[edit]

I think this article as well as the others that its sugested to merge with should be expanded instead of merged,since they have valuable information that would be too heavy to develop in one page,besides the U.S has quite a lot of pages in this sense:

and i dont see a reason why Brazil shouldnt have it,besides the strong U.S bias on Wikipedia--Andres rojas22 17:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comparable Country[edit]

Comparing this page with List of countries by Human Development Index then assuming I understand it correctly the comparable country column is well out of date. I'd suggest dropping it altogether, myself, as a maintenance nightmare. Bagunceiro (talk) 11:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why a maintenance nightmare? The HDI report comes onde a year, so this only needs to be updated once a year. In plus, this is very important information, I wish other countries would have the same comparison tables, also for the different sub-indices of the HDI!!! Also when updating the "old" data should be compiled into some "historical evolution and world comparison of Brazilian states by HDI". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.12.14 (talk) 11:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?[edit]

What's the source for 2011/2010 data? It's totally wrong!

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Brazilian federative units by Human Development Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why this article should revert posterior editions and use old data?[edit]

The current data (of 2014) is from UN, just like the 2010. The data have a source. This topic was created as a esforce to find a consensus with Krosah, who, without any alleged reasons restore old versions of this article.B777-300ER (talk) 00:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]