Talk:List of Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo characters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Villain Chart[edit]

Wait, why did you change it from a villain section to an "all characters" list? I spent all that time diagraming all of the villains in the series and you removed it. -StrangerAtaru 18:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You said so yourself, some of the villains are minor. I trying to make he page look more like this one. And you can always bring those listed villains back. It's not like they're gone forever. --Kid Sonic 04:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC) OK, that's understandable. So then we keep the villains as the main bosses. -StrangerAtaru 12:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Narrator[edit]

Shouldn't the narrator be listed in this? Lord Seth 15:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Er, I feel silly, but I just noticed the narrator is listed in "Recurring characters in Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo" Come to think of it though, shouldn't this page have a link to that somewhere? Lord Seth 16:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor Playoffs[edit]

Why isn't there a section for that arc? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.151.232 (talk) 20:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Essentially all the new characters in the emperor playoffs are all generic employees for the Maruhage Empire without any true affiliation. (or members of the Reverse Maruhage). They are all in one of those two sections. -StrangerAtaru 23:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

I am proposing a merge of all villain subarticles into this page:

  • Villains in Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo and List of Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo villains are duplicates of one another, which should be avoided; the correct target page for a merger would be here.
  • Other subarticles fails notability requirements as well, but at this stage I would only recommend merging the villain articles (which all have a biased name).

G.A.Stalk 18:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been a month since the above notice was given (here as well on the articles), and as there have been no reply (silence implies consensus), I am going ahead with above action. G.A.Stalk 04:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree here, I see alot of the character acticles with no references at all, perfect ones to merge. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]