Talk:Lisa Lashes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Devvo[edit]

Does it deserve a mention, she used his music without permission and lulz was had. Andy Lowson (talk) 21:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


      • Vaio12343***

This article has allot of promotion in it. Lisa lashes seems to need to prompt a commercial dispute that empowered to take a company that was not legally there's to take. they seem to have connections within Wiki to make sure the policies of having an article do not matter, as you can see on there pages, there are allot of hyperlinks to a circle of people who do not realy prove what they claim to have achieved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaio12343 (talkcontribs) 19:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelievable?[edit]

There isn't an article about the Lisa Lashes song Unbelievable, it is a good song and seems to be popular to be Creamfields. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.16.3.114 (talk) 19:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lisa Lashes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]