Talk:Lingo (VoIP Service operator)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Isn't the long blurb about Primus's troubles completely out of place here? I mean the paragraph beginning with "In 2007, Primus Telecom admitted paying..."

This type of tangential information is not pertinent to the topic of Lingo. I have *no problem* with the information residing in the entry for Primus, but it does not belong here.

Just thought I'd ask for relevance before doing anything.

Hi - thanks for discussing before changing. Of the five paragraphs in the Lingo article, the second and third are really about parent Primus Telecom and could be deleted together. I saw the second paragraph as apparently PR, so I added the third for balance. The troubles at Primus are somewhat relevant to Lingo, given the many Lingo customer reports of dishonesty (which almost always starts at the top) and the marketing of 1-year prepaid contracts for service that Primus might be unable to fulfill. Also, the second paragraph cites no sources, while the third paragraph cites four. So, looking at paragraphs 2&3 as Primus assets (unsourced) and liabilities (sourced), I think if paragraph 3 is deleted then paragraph 2 should go with it.TVC 15 04:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E911[edit]

Why is this section here? This is an issue that plagues all VoIP providers, not just Lingo -- ErnestVoice (User) (Talk) 18:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable Sources[edit]

Many of the references in this article are public forms and should be deleted. -- ErnestVoice (User) (Talk) 13:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lingo (VoIP Service operator). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]