Talk:Lisa (Japanese musician, born 1987)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 00:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I Tintor2 (talk) 00:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC), will be reviewing this article. It is looking pretty good but there are some issues I would like to see fixed.[reply]

  • The lead is composed entirely of one paragraph. It could be expanded with some of her influences.
  • Another about the lead is that it mentions too many animes. Just mentioning the first or another which is very notable could be good.
  • The Discography section is almost empty.
  • It is also a bit unsourced. I would recommend expanding it or leaving the link in another section.

Anyways, good work.

@Tintor2: The Discography section is empty because it was split off. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think Tintor2 means that Letters to U, Lover"s"mile, Landspace, Launcher, etc don't have articles at all. Technically a good article review should focus on the page itself and not on additional pages, but having a pop musician GA article without album/song pages feels very odd to me. --Prosperosity (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prosperosity: Someone could make them though. Not me as I'm not exactly experienced when it comes to writing articles on music releases. Arguably the only red link above that could have an article is Launcher since it has a review (which I also used in LiSA's page). As for the lede, I'll be working on it in a bit. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since they're all charted releases that were mentioned in major music press, they pass WP:MUS very easily. The only releases by her which would be contested on notability grounds are....."ID" as it hasn't charted/been reviewed yet, and maybe "Orpheus (Kimi to Kanaderu Ashita e no Uta)" if the article wasn't that great. --Prosperosity (talk) 03:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prosperosity: Well, it would be cool if you could create articles for each of her albums and singles. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I already have a huge backlog, sorry! --Prosperosity (talk) 04:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prosperosity: @Tintor2: The lede has been revised somewhat, being given more meat and being split into two paragraphs. What do you think? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Prosperosity: @Narutolovehinata5: Sorry for the long delay. There I moved a sentence from the discography article to serve as an intro to it. Does it look good?Tintor2 (talk) 17:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2:. Fine with me. Any more suggestions/fixes that have to be done? If not, is it a pass? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 17:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Passed. Congrats.Tintor2 (talk) 17:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the discography listing on the main page, I have added the studio albums, as comparable to Beyonce and other music artists that have split-off discographies. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]