Talk:Legends of Tomorrow season 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Zari Tomaz and Zari Tarazi[edit]

Hi. Do we have a source that both, or at least which one, will be back? As far as I know, at least one Zari will return, but don't know which. My guess is that influencer Zari will leave for good with Constantin to some other plane of existance, for example into the totem, and flannel Zari will be Legend again, but it's just a guess. I suggest to write "* [[Tala Ashe]] as [[Zari Tomaz and Zari Tarazi|Zari]]", until we know for sure. IKhitron (talk) 14:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its better to put your suggestion. Maybe Tarazi will leave the series as Ashe connected better with Tomaz, and wouldn't have to wear so much makeup. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! So the original source that lists the cast actually lists both Tomaz and Tarazi. Furthermore, there's a promo for Season 7 out there, which shows Tarazi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta1bsz6x9iU https://bamsmackpow.com/2021/09/05/dc-legends-of-tomorrow-season-7-premiere-release-date-cast-trailer-news/ (User talk:Actinion) 01:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for me. IKhitron (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

100th episode[edit]

Xeditboy is going with the original title, ignoring what is currently on futoncritic. IKhitron, your input is appreciated. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I also do believe we need to use the FutonCritic one, as official source from press-release. Any tv guide can makeva mistake, just not paying attention to the name change, for example. For any change back in title, The CW would publish a new press-release on FutonCritic immediately, we've already this a lot of times. IKhitron (talk) 12:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Favre1fan93, @YoungForever, what do you think? IKhitron (talk) 12:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kailash29792: If you look at the html source on futon the title is "wvrdr_error_100<oest-of-th3-gs.gid30n> not found" the "<oest-of-th3-gs.gid30n>" is removed by HTML clients as it looks like a markup tag. Xeditboy (talk) 21:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Those nincompoops! Like us they too were affected by technical restrictions, and posted the title without even realising it! Maybe we should use this source as it displays the full title. @Favre1fan93 and @Gonnym, your input is appreciated. Should we move Draft:wvrdr_error_100 not found back? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I follow. Isn't the page now at the correct title? Gonnym (talk) 08:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing else. After being in a quandary for quite some time, I manually fixed it myself. Can't believe futoncritic would post content without checking for mistakes or attempting to rectify them. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do production codes need to be cited?[edit]

@Alex 21:. You think that production codes shouldnt be cited. I say they should. You claim that they dont need to be because of the episode? I say they should because you need to cite your sources. That's a pretty key thing. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are sourced, in the episode, thus making the episode a WP:PRIMARY source. Source: ending credits. I'm not sure what's hard to understand about that? -- Alex_21 TALK 05:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also I have to say our most recnet interactions you have repetedly been agressive and assumed bad faith. #When I templated you after reverting your removal of information you cited WP:DTTR an essay so how about I cite WP:TR.
  1. Is this a threat: "Don't post on my talk page again. You've been warned."
  2. You accused me of edit warring after I reverted your edit, which you reverted again with the same justification as before.
  3. In a GA review you were repeatedly unwilling to take feed back
  4. Your refusal to cooperate led to my GAN failing.
  5. When I reached out in an effort to make ammedned regaurding said GAN you lashed out.Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Use article talk pages for discussion on content, and user talk pages for discussion on conduct. Please discuss the material in the correct location.
As for this talk page, do you have any further comments about the production codes or not? -- Alex_21 TALK 05:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Everytime I try to have a discussion on your talk page you revert it. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have not started any discussion on my talk page. You have used an automated copy-paste process to post a message that does nothing to facilitate discussion, and is used to educate newer editors. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regaurdless, What is the harm in having an additional direct citation backing up the production codes? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because they are already cited by the episodes, and the addition of further content into these cells pulls the columns of the episode tables out of conformity. Do you see the identical situations of the director/writer being cited by the credits, and the production codes being cited by the credits? -- Alex_21 TALK 05:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thats differnt writers and directors credits in in the opening. Production codes if included are almost always tucked into the very end of the credits. Also what the hell does "pulls the columns of the episode tables out of conformity" mean? Oh this article is formatted slighlty different than this article? Change! Different word choice? Change! Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter if they're "tucked away" - they are still included. The font-size of the credits is irrelevant. Can you cite some sort of guideline that says "if the credits are too small, they're uncitable"? I'll happily explain to you, if you attempt to remain civil, since none of those examples are relevant. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not denying that their in the credits. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad you recognize they're in the credits. Thus, they are cited by the episode. Glad we've come to that agreement. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've opened a random GA of yours. series 7 of Doctor Who It reads as follows:
Karen Gillan and Arthur Darvill, who portray Amy Pond and Rory Williams respectively, departed the programme in the fifth episode.
Now you can see this in the credits therefore it doesnt have to be sourced. Gillian and Darvill stop being credited. But oh wait you know what immediately follows that statement? "'Doctor Who' Amy, Rory final episode to be filmed in New York" Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By your own logic that source should be removed. Because we have the episodes. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFF / WP:OTHERCONTENT is a poor argument. Try again. (Or don't, since you're just determined to have an argument on a point that's been proven against you.) -- Alex_21 TALK 07:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your rational for reverting was "just like the 109 other production codes". Which seems to be a WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST arguement. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Within the same series. Common sense. -- Alex_21 TALK 21:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Legends_of_Tomorrow_season_7&oldid=1221422844"