Talk:Lahav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lahav. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Impartial tone[edit]

Hello,

I have some concerns regarding this sentence in a previous version of this page:

The production of pig meat has raised criticism since the Torah prohibits the consumption of pork, which goes against the prevailing narrative of Israel as a "Jewish state".

The issue here is regarding WP:NPOV, Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. As I stated before, in describing disputes, Wikipedia's text must stay neutral (see WP:IMPARTIAL). I believe the phrase "goes against the prevailing narrative of Israel as a Jewish state" is a violation of this policy, since it is written in an accusatory, biased tone against the state of Israel. Whether the existence of a pig farm for human consumption invalidates the notion that the entire state of Israel follows Jewish teachings isn't part of the scope of this article. Additionally, the first part of the sentence already adequately covers this controversy. Therefore, I've removed the second part of the sentence. Ganbaruby! 16:45, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this is biased, and in particular, how it is biased against Israel given that the country promotes itself as a Jewish state. Number 57 20:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
your response does not make a lot of sense my friend and since there is not citation on what you said and if affects the naturality of the article I have deleted it. Lifeisgood12345 (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]