This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article was copy edited by quityergreeting, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 26 Oct 2010.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Previous copyedits:
/
This article was copy edited by e.w.bullock on 8 May 2010.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article shouldn't be deleted. LM.C have worked hard to get from Miyavi's support band to their own band, they deserve to have a page on them, at least. There might not be a lot of information on them. But I'm working on it. --Soushisouai 07:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is, having a page on Wikipedia has nothing to do with deserving it, and everything to do with notability guidelines. If you can find adequate sources for a notability claim, go ahead and flesh out the article. Good editing! Coren 02:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But LM.C fits atleast two if not more standards on there. They have singles and mini albums. I put them up and everything. I don't really know how to do this, so I won't be too disappointed if they delete it. But it won't stop me from trying to get a page for them. ha. Thanks. :3 Soushisouai 08:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now, indeed, it does. Sufficiently, at least, not not deserve a speedy tag. Good work. Coren 03:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There has been no mention, but the article is written in a way that promotes and hypes the band, which defeat the standard guidelines set out by Wikipedia to maintain neutrality for each article; articles should be written with a neutral point of view. I have done some edits to correct this/make the article sound less promotional. Please re-edit/undo if this is not achieved. Lpjz290 (talk) 00:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
