Talk:Kursk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2006 messages[edit]

The page seem to contain almost no information about modern life of Kursk and even have no links to administrations' websites. My attempt to add a photograph of modern Kursk was reverted with the image being described as 'hardly informative rural creek' (in fact this is an area in the very centre of Kursk ([1] - place of shooting, camera looking southwestbound) with 'private sector' houses in the foreground and a number of multi-storey urban blocks in the background). Is it a policy - to describe a large central-Russian regional center trough two aged b/w photos of cathedrals and accepting no actual additions? Ss r 09:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The revert also seem to return the wrong statement that Battle of Kursk was "major turning point of the war" (in fact Battle of Stalingrad was) and the doubtful sentence "after which time Germany's fortunes began to decline" was returned instead of more correct "the last major German offensive mounted against USSR". Could you please clarify your policies? Your revert doesn't seem to be logical. Ss r 10:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

battle of kursk[edit]

battle of kursk is not really a turning point, stalingrad was because that was the first major german defeat of the whole war, battle of moscow was because thats when the germans' advance was haulted for the first time. i changed the article to reflect this.

--Greg.loutsenko 23:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's also not the largest tank battle in history any more. More tanks engaged in combat in the Golan heights in 1973 than fought at Kursk. Likewise, more tanks fought in the Sinai during the same war, though they arguably fought over a large enough area that they may not be considered a single battle. I am unable to edit the section of the article that continues to claim it was the largest tank battle in history (as it was, up until October of 1973) since there is no "edit button" for that section

--Jeff.Vandine 13:25, 16 January 2012 (MST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.171.0.146 (talk)

I'm glad you can't change that, then, because you'd be wrong and there'd be absolutely no citation for that. The whole 1973 Arab-Israeli War didn't have as many tanks as the Battle of Kursk. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ROSI/Kursk Chamber Orchestra[edit]

Difficult to find references for things, as I only speak a few words of Russian.

Regarding ROSI and KCO, the best I can offer is that I was just there.

EEBaum 18:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Architecture[edit]

Not sure about this but is the architecture in the photo actually Stalinist, or just plain neoclassical? HowardSelsam 08:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source Under Attractions Section[edit]

The first footnote source does not seem to have anything to do with this particular section of the article, as it directs to an arguably irrelevant website. XRedcomet (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kursk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kursk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

German occupation[edit]

I don't have an exact date, but wasn't the German occupation ending during Operation Star? The current article text seems inconsistent with both that are the following sentence about the Battle of Kursk. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved now. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 00:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]