Talk:Krivošije uprising (1869)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Krivošije uprising (1869) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Montenegro

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Serbia High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox[edit]

The article is six paragraphs long. The first paragraph tells us when, where and who. The infobox is not needed. It tell us there were 10,000 A-H troops, but the article says only that there were 10,000 reinforcements with several other battalions in the field. It names Wagner as A-H commander, but he was eventually replaced by Rodić. Srnec (talk) 00:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove the troop numbers until I can provide a source for them. ALso, I intend to expand the article when I find the time, so please bear with me. Also I will add Rodić. Sideshow Bob 06:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You took the numbers from the article, which is sourced. The problem is that 10,000 is not the total. I do not see why an infobox is need for summarizing in the case of a small conflict like this that is already summarised right there in the first two lines. If you are planning to expand the article, why not add the infobox then? Srnec (talk) 12:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]