This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
I draftified a different version of this not too long ago. It has additional
references not in this article. WP:TOOSOON was my opinion on the subject. Regards, Zindor (talk) 15:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zindor, As a director of 6 notable films, Tirumala surely qualifies WP:FILMMAKER right? Ab207 (talk) 13:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IMO not that clear cut. I illuminate more on the review here. Regards, Zindor (talk) 14:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zindor, Your judgement must have been well thought, I assume. But now we are in odd situation where neatly arranged article is in draftspace while a poorly shaped article is on mainspace. Is there a way a merge these two? Ab207 (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now that's a fun question lol. Personally i'd be inclined to AfD this article, and when we reach such a time that Kishore Tirumala becomes notable, move the old draft into mainspace. I've been holding off on the AfD nom because i thought Amkgp might be interested in doing it. If the article gets kept at AfD, which seems unlikely but not impossible, then we can figure out merge options which should be easy given these are just stubs. Zindor (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zindor, You may go ahead for AfD as I see you had already posted concerns here ~ Amkgp💬 16:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ab207: I discounted Pillaiyar Theru Kadaisi Veedu (PTKV) because the Indian Express critic effectively binned the thing. Same with Nenu.. Sailaga.., both the TOI and The Hindu critics say it doesn't really bring anything new. Works that receive trash reviews don't really provide a good measure for working out the notability of a creative professional. That being said, The Hindu review you found about PTKV and the reviews of Chitralahari are enough for me to be convinced that the subject now passes NDIRECTOR. That was good work. I've marked the page as reviewed.
If you're merging content over from the draft, be sure to provide attribution in your edit summary about where it came from. Kind regards, Zindor (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zindor, Thanks for that. While I don't concur with your assessment of Nenu.. Sailaja..., I'm glad the issue is sorted out. Thanks again for being responsive! Ab207 (talk) 20:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
