Talk:Kingswear Castle

Kingswear Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 23, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kingswear Castle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Mid‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Medieval / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kingswear Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of this one, so I may as well find out now... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox checks -- no dab or EL issues.

Prose/structure -- my usual copyedit but no further concerns unless you feel I broke something.

Detail -- succinct, but I think reasonable for GA-level.

Referencing -- nothing leapt out re. reliability or formatting.

Images -- licensing checks out; my only suggestion is that it seems a shame to render these nice pics at the default size, I'd have thought the infobox photo (and map) could easily be say 280px, and the 1880 pic could get away with an upright factor of 1.2 or 1.3; just a thought...

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Ian. I've upped the size of the info box images as suggested, and increased the 1880 pic to 1.2 upright. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay tks -- was mainly leaving it open to ensure no issues with my copyedit so passing now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]