Talk:King Edward Memorial Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conflict of interest[edit]

User:Trumankemp (talk) has repeatedly removed cited material on Tower Hamlets Council's official position.

I'm an independent editor, with no axe to grind. I don't work for Thames Water or any other organisation connected to the project. The park is notable and the debate over the tunnel works is notable, which is why I created the article. By all means add to it, but don't delete cited material and references without explanation.

Please read Wikipedia's policies WP:Neutral point of view and WP:Conflict of interest before your next edits. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, on the second occasion I also reverted cited material by mistake, although I'm not sure that Facebook is a good source; see WP:PSTS. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have an interest in the park as a local person. But no more than that.... Gordo (talk) 21:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shadwell Park or King Edward VII Memorial Park?[edit]

I grew up in the area, and we always called it Shadwell (or Shaddy) Park. I notice that in the text of the article it says "The importance of King Edward VII Memorial Park for the locals is shown by the number of memorials in the park. Shadwell Park is so dear to the communities around it that many people choose to have their memorials there."

My question then: is Shadwell Park another name for King Edward VII Memorial Park or is it located within? The article doesn't make this clear. MarpoHarks (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Edward Memorial Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]