Talk:Kigali Amendment

Kigali Amendment was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 5, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Science Policy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kigali Amendment/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arcahaeoindris (talk · contribs) 16:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC) I'll review this. Give me some time to give this a read. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, having given this a read, I think I will have to give this a WP:QUICKFAIL. This article is not currently illustrated with any images, and I think it is still too brief to really cover the necessary amount of detail for this to be considered a Good article. I highly recommend giving the Good article criteria a close read and try to expand this article further with illustrations and further information, and then submitting it again when it is further developed. For instance, this article does not provide any information about e.g. reception to the amendment, how it was negotiated, whether it has been successfully implemented etc. Feel free to ask for more information on my talk page. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 16:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]