This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kiff VandenHeuvel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
I've re-added the maintenance templates originally added here by Reddogsix, but subsequently removed here by 23.242.78.120 because I don't believe the issues have been sufficiently addressed. While it is true that more sources have been added by 23.242.78.120, it's not necessary the quantity of sources, but rather the respective quality of the sources which matter when it comes to establishing Wikipedia notability. Interviews, podcasts, etc. may be acceptable to some degree for verifying certain article content as explained in WP:BLPSELFPUB, but they are primary sources and primary sources are not helpful at all in establishing Wikipedia notability per WP:BASIC. What is needed are examples of significant coverage in reliable sources which are independent of the subject matter. Listings like this, this and this as well as promotional pieces like this and this are not really helpful at all when it comes to Wikipedia notability. What is needed are more sources like this, perhaps a little more national in scope, to show that VandenHeuvel at least meets WP:NACTOR. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
