Talk:Karl Wenclas

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Untitled[edit]

Doesn't Wikipedia have a policy against writing articles about yourself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.67.99.175 (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny that anyone would think I'd post such an obviously distorted entry about myself. There's very little neutrality to this entry. For instance, I've posted well over 100,000 words at my main blog. A handful of those words related to Ms. Palin-- and those were off topic asides. The theme of that blog is the literary scene. Why feel the need, then, to add that to my entry, other than an attempt to discredit me? Note, please, people, that attacks on, or distortions about, myself and the ULA, are almost done anonymously. The distortions, though, are because our ideas are relevant. They truly threaten these individuals, and the complacency of their scene. -Karl Wenclas 3/22/2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlwenclas (talk • contribs) 17:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, "King" puts up grandiose claims about himself that only he would care about. *yawn* —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jookyjo (talk • contribs) 11:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's sad that someone would come onto this entry anonymously for the sole purpose of making personal attacks. This, in response to revelations of real corruption among the literary mainstream at my blog and on the ULA's site. Does any action more prove the ULA case?

Wenclas, the assumption that everyone who objects to your flagrant dishonesty and endless self-promotion with so little bonafide writing attached to it must be a literary insider is one of the weakest aspects of your work. I have no quarrel with your exposure of corruption - only your pointless and petty bullying. But go on: delete anything you object to. That'll show your support for free expression. The changes to your profile aren't "personal attacks" - they're a more balanced portrait of your activities than you yourself are capable of making.

Flagrant postings and re-postings of libellous material such as "Quilty10" is responsible for on this entry are violations of Wiki's policy on living figures. Not only does he post defamatory material about a living person, he disguises his postings as "Updating history" and "External Links." This is not the place for a flame war, and I would hope any further violations by Quilty10 would be handled by the admin. Chip 17:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV template without ongoing discussion per Template:POV instructions[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Karl Wenclas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]