Talk:KHSL-TV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ideas[edit]

The KHSL page gives a history of both the radio and television stations. It is for historical purposes only. The stations are now owned by two different companies as their seperate pages indicate. They are a major part of Chico's long history. It is not a disambigation page. Mike S. 11:41pm PDT, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

A better idea would be to include KNVN and Catamount-owned KHSL (1998-present) on one page and the historic family-owned KHSL (1956-1994) on another (included with KPAY or KHSL-FM). KHSL and KNVN are not separately owned now, but they are now financially troubled and rumors are floating around that they may become separate again. All edits on this page are backed up by primary sources, including station management, the chief engineer, and other media outlets in the area (particularly the Chico News & Review) This comment is made by a resident of the Chico/Redding area that knows a lot of details about the local area. 11:10pm PDT, 09 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.54.236.175 (talk)

Those rumors continue to swirl, but I have heard from a station employee that the rumors are not true. If there is proof that KHSL-TV and KNVN are on the verge of going bankrupt, sources need to be cited and substantiated. Otherwise, all rumors of bankrupcy or sales of the stations should be removed. 208.106.74.27 (talk) 13:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KHSL-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]