Talk:Justice Sunday

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Long-time Wikipedia reader, first-time "editor." My question about this page is that it doesn't seem to have a neutral POV. The first main section, Justice Sunday, has an extended aside on "Social Justice Sunday" and calls it equally successful. The second section, Justice Sunday II, only talks about Bill Frist breaking ranks. The third section, Justice Sunday III, seems only to highlight the most extreme positions advanced. Finally, the external links section seems to have lots of links to articles harshly critical of the event. I was surprised the article didn't have some sort of warning that the neutrality of the POV was disputed. ConDissenter 23:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boone quote[edit]

I have deleted this quote:

"Rev. Wellington Boone, a speaker at Justice Sunday III, proclaimed, "The black community must stop criticizing Uncle Tom. He is a role model."[1]"

The link appears to be a questionable website that is an interview with actor Gary Busey where he references Boone speaking at an event unrelated to this. If the quote is accurate, it needs a proper citation and should be on on Rev. Boone's page as it does not appear to have relevance to "Justice Sunday".66.72.215.225 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Justice Sunday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060110145740/http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2005/11/18/news/13876.shtml to http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2005/11/18/news/13876.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]