Talk:Juniata County, Pennsylvania/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) 02:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Notes[edit]

Pretty good! I fixed what few errors there were. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 02:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AmaryllisGardener: Wow, great! I'm glad it got through so easily. I did have one comment though. A while back, someone removed "Township" from the names of all the townships. I reverted, but they re-reverted and haven't responded (this was two or three months ago), so now the names are stuck the way they are permanently. I was hoping they could be changed back at some point, but what are your thoughts? --Jakob (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jakec: I don't really have an opinion, the section is a list of townships, but the townships are usually referred to as "X Township" most of the time. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 14:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]