Talk:Joypolis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closing of Joypolis Osaka[edit]

The Osaka Joypolis is gone. It's been replaced with VR Zone Osaka: https://vrzone-pic.com/osaka/ A goodbye message is here: http://umeda-joypolis.sega.jp/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.142.97.177 (talk) 08:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing of Joypolis Tokyo[edit]

The paragraph about the Accident is telling the reader that the Tokyo Joypolis was closed down, giving the impression that there is no longer an active Joypolis in Tokyo. This is a bit misleading and confusing. Originally there were 2 Joypolis in Tokyo, one in Shinjuku and one in Odaiba beach. The shinjuku one got closed due to the accident, but the Odaiba beach one is still active.

Proposed merge with Yokohama Joypolis[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge. -- ferret (talk) 15:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This subarticle is unsourced and has no apparent significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) It is standard to cover topics like this within their parent (Joypolis), where they can always spin out summary style if warranted by the sources. czar 14:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge Per Czar. -- ferret (talk) 19:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per Czar. Additionally, judging from the edit summaries, I haven't seen any counter-argument other than "The JP Wiki has one", which doesn't really matter. If the Joypolis article ever gets massive, and there's sources present to split, then by all means, split it out. But right now, anyone wanting to work on Joypolis related things should just focus on cleaning up this terrible looking article rather than splitting off into even more junk... Sergecross73 msg me 19:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Joypolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joypolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]