This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mass spectrometry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Mass spectrometryWikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometryTemplate:WikiProject Mass spectrometryMass spectrometry articles
Not seeing a good rationale for this revert. Its major effects were to add redundancy and reduce accessibility. The one exception was the addition of Harvard to the employers list - I have retained that improvement but reverted the other changes. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:04, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Nikkimaria: thanks for your edits. I reverted this because the edit had removed a significant amount data. The portrait was removed and the awards were removed by switching templates (something which wasn't documented in the edit summary). Personally, I'd appreciate it if when switching from Template:Infobox person/Wikidata to Template:Infobox scientist more care was taken not to delete information which has been carefully entered into wikidata. There are many examples of where this has happened, this is only one.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Duncan.Hull (talk • contribs)
You should probably take a closer look at the output - no true award was removed. The suffix was appropriately entered as a suffix, and the other two awards were retained in |awards=. The only "award" removal was the PhD, which is not an award and should not be included in that parameter. Thus, I'm restoring the previous version, with the addition of the image. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Nikkimaria: thanks for the feedback. I disagree that PhD is not an award. PhD's are awarded by a degree granting institution. The documentation for Template:Infobox scientist says award is a "Notable awards/prizes received by the scientist". So whereas first degrees might not be considered notable, higher degrees like Doctor of Science or Doctor of Philosophy could reasonably be considered notable awards. For example, if you look at how biographical sources like Who's Who (UK) mention awards, it is common for PhD to be mentioned in a short lists (much the same way as awards in infoboxes). See http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whoswho/U287272/(subscription required) for Maria Fitzgerald. The entry reads FITZGERALD, Prof. Maria (followed by a list of notable awards) PhD; FRS 2016; FRCA, FMedSci. There are many other examples like this, and that seems reasonable to me. Also, many of your edits you mark as "conversion" add redundancy by duplicating information that I have already entered into wikidata, in my opinion, this is a waste of both of our valuable editing time, and could introduce new errors and discrepancies. Duncan.Hull (talk) 21:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The documentation of both {{infobox scientist}} and {{infobox person}} indicate that academic degrees should be included in |education=, if they are included at all. Our manual of style for biographies specifically forbids the formatting used by Who's Who. If you disagree with those practices, I'd suggest starting a central discussion. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
