This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
John Lesley is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
I've added a {{fact}} tag to the article. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "Black Acts" were 49 acts of the Scots Parliament passed in 1584, one of which is most famous as an assertion of James VI's control over the clergy. These were negated by the "Golden Act" of 1592. Is there another famous/notable "Black Acts", printed in 1566? If so, remove my tag and please comment here (I'll return to read it). Else, the mention of "Black Acts" should be deleted, as it is misleading and inaccurate. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 21:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know, but the text is copied from EB1911 so it is from a verifiable reliable source. If you think EB1911 is wrong then you will need to do some investigation and come up with a more modern reliable source to challenge it. -- PBS (talk) 02:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]