This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Henry Wright article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
A fact from John Henry Wright appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Harvard professor John Henry Wright(pictured), whose teaching range was "encyclopaedic", described Indian Hindu monk Swami Vivekananda as "more learned than all our learned professors put together"?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swami Vivekananda, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swami Vivekananda on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Swami VivekanandaWikipedia:WikiProject Swami VivekanandaTemplate:WikiProject Swami VivekanandaSwami Vivekananda articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I have removed two references citing my own work as a source. While I'm flattered, it does not meet wikipedia's standards for a reliable source. Not that I regard myself unreliable as such, but the citations pointed to my own self-published website, in once instance to a piece reproduced from an article I had previously written for wikipedia itself! I rather doubt it's permissible for wikipedia to cite itself as an authority, even at one remove. The ultimate reliable sources for the information are standard bibliographical resources; I'll see about tracking them down and adding them in at some point. BPK (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your rectitude is admirable. Report to the Dean's office at your leisure for your ritual spanking. EEng (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As I gather the references were added by Rosiestep, your slap on the wrist should probably be directed in that direction. BPK (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
