Talk:Jizzakh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can it be spelled Banjzak??[edit]

In the drive to make articles for every city in the world with more than 100.000 inhabitants, one Uzbek city called Banjzak was listed. I couldn't for the life of me find that city on any map, and the only google hit worth looking at was a UN population list which when I cross-ref checked was missing the city Jizzakh, but did have a city called Banjzak listed with the exact same 1999-population as Jizzakh is said to have in this article (126.400). So I concluded that the cities are the same, and that it's just some UN-worker who has got the name Джизак wrongly translated. But I've never even been to Uzbekistan, don't speak the language, never bought the t-shirt, and is exceptionally ignorant about Uzbekistan geography. So if anyone reading this knows that this is obviously wrong, that there is an Uzbek city called Banjzak (maybe called something else now), and that Jizzakh is a different city, then please fix my [[Banjzak] redirect, and accept my appology. Thanks. Shanes 02:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jizzakh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]