Talk:Jayadevan's system

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Cricket stub]] (and recursive categories) on the article page.

• If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
• If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Cricket|class=stub|importance=low}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

Duplicate?

This article appears to be a duplicate of this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VJD_System

Consider merging them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.75.139.34 (talk) 15:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion

Somebody should merge VJD System into this article. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Agreed! Can't see there being any argument against it. VJD System is a legit article but it was created well after this one.MrAngy (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Merge. Essentially the same topic covered by both articles. Suraj T 17:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't think we actually need a !vote. This is a cut and dry merge scenario, someone just needs to do it. I'm busy with the wikification drive, otherwise I'd merge them myself. Ryan Vesey Review me! 18:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Agree with the merger, but I think that VJD System is the article that should be kept as that seems to be the most common name used to refer to the system. Dergraaf (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

The other article should be merged into this because this has existed much longer and has more rich edit history. A move discussion could then take place. Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Merge done. Monkeyblue 02:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC)