Talk:Jason Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ext links[edit]

It seems odd that some of the ext links have an "official site" qualifier. 203.173.186.163 (talk) 06:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: According to the page's protection level and your user rights, you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jason Day (golfer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 April 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have consensus that this is the primary topic. Cúchullain t/c 16:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


– Clearly the golfer is now the primary topic. He's been top 10 in the world for a few years and has won a major. Page view stats are overwhelming. The-Pope (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mild Oppose probably he does pass the threshold in of more than 66% references in Google Books, just. However there's still a good chance of mislinks with Jason Day (fighter) (born 1981), Canadian mixed martial artist, Jason Day (actor) (born 1985), Peruvian actor, Jason Day (rower) (born 1970), Australian Olympic rower, and (golfer) appears to be helping readers find the golfer at the moment. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – moving a title to a more ambiguous title based on recent popularity via a primarytopic grab does nobody any good. Dicklyon (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support, per the golfer establishing himself as far more notable than the competition + pageviews pointing overwhelmingly in his favor. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Seriously? 99% of pageviews for the golfer? And we'd rather send readers to the dab page because...? Dohn joe (talk) 03:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per overwhelming page view statistics in favor of the golfer. -- Tavix (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support there has been a large spike recently, such that the golfer has received 98.6% of page views over the last 90 days. But even looking at the first two months of the year when there was less traffic, he still received 94% of the page views. If that is not enough to establish a primary topic then I don't know what is. Meanwhile, I can't see any basis for the oppose that claims "recent popularity". The rower's article was created yesterday and the other two have barely advanced beyond stub level in the years that the articles have existed. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support An obvious primary topic if I ever saw one. Let's see what the other topics are: some Peruvian actor with a thin IMDb and a whopping 11 credits, a retired martial artist with a 61% win rate who fought mostly non-notable people, and an Olympic rower who went home empty-handed and has not been active in his field for 15 years. If one of these folks somehow manage to rise above a PGA champion and world no. 1 golfer in the future, I'll eat my hat. Nohomersryan (talk) 12:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - easy primary topic. Unreal7 (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Nohomersryan's sound and accurate analysis about the alternative topics. 98.6% of page views is also a solid enough evidence of the golfer being the primary topic for our readers. Cavarrone 06:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Nohomersryan and other arguments of Primary use policy. CookieMonster755 (talk) 03:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - pageviews & easily the primary topic. Kingutd (talk) 01:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jason Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jason_Day&oldid=1206897367"