Talk:J. Scott Campbell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External link not updated[edit]

External link : this site "J. Scott Campbell Fan" isn't updated since a very looong time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.23.69.187 (talkcontribs) 15:20, 1 August 2006

That's not important as long as it contains information pertaining to the topic. --GentlemanGhost 15:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-nude pornography[edit]

Sure, Campbell uses women in highly "sexualized" situations, but this is by no means non nude pornography, I'm removing all references. 65.219.235.164 04:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on. You don't call this non-nude pornography?A gx7 04:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps pornography is in the eye of the beholder? :) In any event, our opinions don't matter. If you can find a reliable source that calls his work pornography, then you could cite it in the article. I wouldn't give this undue weight, however, as I think this is a minority opinion. --GentlemanGhost 16:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on J. Scott Campbell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on J. Scott Campbell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comicsgate involvement[edit]

I noticed a reference to this has already been removed, and considering the wording and lack of reliable sources, I can see why. However, the fact still stands, J Scott Campbell has been criticized in the past for highly sexualised depiction of female characters, including ones that are under legal age, and is notorious for having a very thin skin when it comes to criticism of his work, even calling his critics "SJW"s at one point.

More recently, the alt-right hate movement Comicsgate attempted to astroturf support for him, after he was criticized for yet another one of his pin-ups. Campbell made a public statement disavowing comicsgate and the alt-right, and denouncing racism, misogyny, homophobia and transphobia. In response, he was attacked and harrassed by an alt-right mob. He followed this up with yet another public statement, claiming he spoke to several members of Comicsgate and found them to be reasonable people. YIKES!

I'm unaware, of any reliable sources covering this story, unfortunately. Nevertheless it might be a good idea to keep an eye out on this topic, as it might hit the threshold of notability. I would also suggest anticipation of vandalism of this article from comicsgate trolls. They do see him as a potential enemy right now. 46.97.170.112 (talk) 12:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]