Talk:Isa bek Hajinski House

Azerbaijan Low‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Erreur de localisation[edit]

Cet édifice se trouve à Baku en Azerbaijan et non à Poissy en France comme indiqué sur la carte. David Cagneaux (talk) 07:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprod[edit]

Hi Golden, I noticed you deprodded this article, and why you did so. This is how the article looked like at the time of me PRODing. I explained why I PRODed and highlighted the problems with the unreliable sourcing and the lack of notability in the description, not sure what you are calling "Inappropriate". It fails WP:NBUILDING (the second point) as there is no reason for independent notability in significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources, the building doesn't INHERIT the notability of persons who lived in it. I noticed now that 1 was a journal article with no citations, a primary source, not a government source. 2 was a government source (non-independent), 3 was a dead tourist resource and 4 has a passing mention that did not support its inline citation (in a touristic pamphlet in the webpage of the "Euroasia Congress of Infectious Diseases", which isn't possibly reliable). both sources you've added are also passing mentions. the way PRODing works is that it's a proposal to delete due to clear problems in the article, If users think they can improve the article by adding sources etc. then they (including you) are welcome to do so and remove the suggestion. Now, looking at the article again, none of the issues I've highlighted are addressed, other issues are still present as well: lots of OR (even after the sources that you've added), tourist-agency-promo language such as "the style of ancient Assyria create a fantastic impression and take you to a fairytale world.", "The irrepressible fancy of the owner, the refined taste of the architect and the high quality of the construction created an authentic masterpiece of pure Baku architecture". Yourself being an experienced editor, I'm baffled at your dismissal of the given issues as just an "Inappropriate PROD". - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC) tourist- an[reply]

Please review WP:PROD and pay close attention to the section in WP:PRODNOM that discusses alternatives to deletion. You did not make any effort to improve the article beforehand. I was able to find two reliable sources by simply searching for the house name once on Google, and I am confident that I could find more with further searching. Given your history of inappropriately tagging Azerbaijan-related articles for deletion, I would advise you to be cautious with future deletion requests. Keep in mind: PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected. Since this is AA3, you can expect opposition to anything. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 19:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]