Talk:Invaders of the Rokujouma!?

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 22 August 2014[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Xezbeth (talk) 11:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was proposed in this section that Invaders of the Rokujouma!? be renamed and moved to Invaders of the Rokujyōma!?.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

Rokujyoma no Shinryakusha!? → Invaders of the Rokujyōma!? – Per WP:USEENGLISH and WP:COMMONNAME, this is the English title that is used by reliable English-language sources as given in the article. —Farix (t | c) 19:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support Just do it. That's what Sentai has announced the title to be. It can be changed if they tweak the spelling when they release their first video. -AngusWOOF (talk) 20:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, there is a created redirect in the way and I can't do it automatically. —Farix (t | c) 22:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Try the RMAssist thing at WP:RM? -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I tried a similar request before but had it rejected because it wasn't a simple spelling or capitalization fix. —Farix (t | c) 22:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You can just ask me, I have no problem doing things like this. Even if I disagreed I'd probably move it anyway. —Xezbeth (talk) 11:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Move I hope this can be closed soon as I highly doubt that anyone would contest the move based on your policy rationale. Farix I would ask over at WP:AN for assistance no need to have this drag out for 7 days (In some cases much longer) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Move per nom. SephyTheThird (talk) 07:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Romanization error[edit]

Why is it "Rokujyōma" when every Japanese website uses "Rokujoma" and the Hepburn form should be "Rokujōma"?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Every English-language source to date has used "Rokujyōma" or "Rokujyoma", including Sentai Filmworks' press release. And even the official website for the manga uses Rokujyoma,[1] so who are we to say that it is "wrong"? —Farix (t | c) 20:08, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm only pointing out the inconsistency with WP:MOS-JA's stance on using Hepburn romanization, in which "jyo" does not exist.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using ō instead of o is ridiculous, since there are over 300 million Americas who don't use that, and our keyboards don't even have an option to make that appear. Dream Focus 14:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it may be the case where Sentai might title it with a non-standard spelling jyō instead of jyo or jō. Maybe they'll bother to translate the word? We'll have to see when they roll out the video. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2014[edit]

This edit request to Invaders of the Rokujyōma!? has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The link to harem (in genre) is links to what harem means history wise not anime wise it should be linked to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harem_(genre) NOT this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harem 5.69.190.62 (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 18:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 May 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Administrator will move page due to title blacklist. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane ^talk 05:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invaders of the Rokujyōma!? → Invaders of the Rokujouma!? – This is the title used by the English publisher of the original work. Can't move it since the interrobang is blacklisted. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 04:56, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Hhkohh (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Better discuss than direct move. Hhkohh (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.