Talk:Inflow (meteorology)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
I made some copy-edits for clarity and style diff.

Although addressed in the latter part of the section Extratropical cyclones, the first paragraph of that section does not address the difference in polarity (N-S) and direction (E-W) between the northern and southern hemispheres. Done

The article complies sufficiently with the manual of style
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All online cited references are live, all appear reliable, all appear to support the cited statements.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
A succinct and concise description of the phenonomen
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Nearly there, just one issue above to be addressed. On Hold for seven days. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have now made the changes you requested within the extratropical cyclone section. Let me know if it needs more clarification. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for addressing that. I felt it was important to clarify this s we must remember that Wikipedia should reflect a global view, rather than one confined to just one hemisphere. I am happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]