Talk:House of Slaves

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please[edit]

please in ghana we have no ewe but eve — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.87.88.10 (talkcontribs) 11:41, 17 August 2006

Rewrite and move[edit]

As important and controversial as this site is, I'm trying to expand and rewrite it into something that expresses both sides of the argument, and is about the whole memorial/museum not just the "door". More refs the better, especially on its importance as a tourist "pilgrimage" to both the Senegalese and the visitors. T L Miles (talk) 19:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The scientific scrupulous statisticians and those who cite them without regard for the human race as one may go to hell. The African-American Slave Trade Museum should be built in every low crime neighborhood with a self-identified Caucasian majority. One nation? Welcome home Uncle Tom.Kylecrabtree (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Angola Fits In the House of Slaves Academic Controversy[edit]

Covering up the fact about Angola's prominence is not helpful and not in anyway neutral.2601:447:4101:41F9:AD9B:A39:8E5B:D05D (talk) 00:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK, there is no conspiracy. You just need to come up with a reliable source--easy. Drmies (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I have. As someone who does research for a living, don't give me nonsense about what is a reliable source. Politics is not neutral. Erasing even a Library of Congress source is not helpful either.2601:447:4101:41F9:AD9B:A39:8E5B:D05D (talk) 00:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't know what kind of research you're doing, but if it's OK to cite some website with no clear editorial information, I'm not hiring you. Drmies (talk) 01:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not blocking you--I'm just going to semi-protect the article. If you want to achieve something, you can try to do that on this talk page. Drmies (talk) 01:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]