Talk:House Training

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Television: Episode coverage / House Mid‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect is supported by the House task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

The synopsis of this episode is taken word for word from: http://www.housemd-guide.com/season3/320training.php doesn't that violate wikipedia's guidelines?

Bonnie[edit]

This summery doesn't mention anything about Bonnie and House's intereaction, which was a huge part of the episode both timewise and plot - that's partly why Lupe's case went south. House was too busy prying into Wilson's personal business to pay attention to his team. BethEnd 16:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The synopsis needs to be rewritten. But.. In almost every episode, House's interfering causes him to be too distracted, thus causing (near) death. Ğavin Ťing 17:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis is wrong[edit]

Lupe was not 'working' a scam. She was clearly a dupe of the scam. The fact that she was winning does not mean she was in on it. It means that the scam artist was engendering trust by giving some wins so that he would have the air of legitimacy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.65.116.130 (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The episode is inconclusive as to whether she is a con-artist. The way the card scam usually works is that an accomplice starts the game (and the audiences interest) by "winning" some hands, thereby getting a real punter to put some money in (as is starting to happen with the man at the edge of the crowd just before she collapses). What I was surprised about was that he doesn't make a reappearance in the episode. All the talk of the crack pipe "only taking a few drags" and the mention of her being a scam-artist with her frequent but short jobs, allowing her to qualify for benefits and then quitting. We have to though to with what is on screen - she is never linked directly with the male con-artist apart from being there at the con. The male con-artist though isn't really shown giving any indication he knows her though.Mmm commentaries 21:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I felt the need to change it, I know the episode is inconclusive, but in my opinion the fact that the con artist immediately took the money and ran when she collapsed shows some evidence that she was a legitimate customer. Also him asking her did she want to let someone else go ahead shows he didn't seem fussed whether or not she played. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Errlloyd (talk • contribs) 01:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:House320.png[edit]

Image:House320.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not the first Dead Patient[edit]

They experimented on a baby in the episode maternity(season 1 episode 4) that resulted in a baby's death —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.21.154.108 (talk) 07:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on House Training. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]