Talk:Holy Islamville, South Carolina

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Removing incendiary claim[edit]

I've removed an unsourced claim from the original article linking the Holy Islamville founder to a terrorist organization. The poster of the original article can cite a source, if possible. DJ Silverfish 15:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I've provided a source this time. BrooklynHabiru 01:24, 08 July 2007

I'm going change the language of that so-called terrorist link. It is clearly highly speculative and should be indicated as such. Also, the US Dept of State brief you linked clearly said that Jamaat ul-Fuqra had been removed from the Foreign Terrorist Organization list.BurhanB 20:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaat al-Fuqra’s status as a terrorist organization is not “highly speculative” as has been made evidently clear by the activities of its members. The language you contest however has been amended to reflect the fact that it no longer is listed on the FTO. BrooklynHabiru 10:41, 09 October 2007

Restored Link[edit]

Brentgarfield removed the link concerning the geographic location of the community with no reason cited. I restored it with the belief that it is pertinent to the article. BrooklynHabiru 01:25, 08 July 2007

Cite please for the "miracles"[edit]

this is my first edit on wikipedia, but i can't believe no one has added this yet. Claims of supernatural miracles surely require some source, right? Phaeton83 (talk) 03:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]