Talk:History of Casablanca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article is not on history of the city of Casablanca as such - it's more about archaeological findings in area. To make things worse, the bibliography section is three times the length of the article itself. Therefore, I suggest either generalizing the topic or merging the information into the article Casablanca. --BotevFixer (talk) 14:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I eliminated most of the archaology stuff except that in the first paragrph and added some info from the main article. Hope this helps. December 21, 2012 (talk) 23:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, now it looks better. :) --BotevFixer (talk) 17:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casablanca1950s.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Casablanca1950s.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 15:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Casablanca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Torch?[edit]

A serious omission here. There is a brief note about Operation Torch (Nov. 1942) in the Casablanca article, but nothing about it here. Is it permissible to reproduce the Casablanca section from the Wiki page on Operation Torch? It's not very well referenced - only one cite. What's the policy on this? Valetude (talk) 14:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done it. Valetude (talk) 09:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]