This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Done
The characters list in the infobox was run-on text as here which was a "sea of text" with breaks in awkward places. I formatted it as a plainlist, as per the infobox template instructions, as here which, to me, looks extremely awkwardly long. As there is a detailed character list in the article, I propose that the list is removed from the infobox - any comments? - Arjayay (talk) 12:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the long cast list should not be in the info box, but I think it should be maybe trimmed and moved into the article. The list of both actors and cast (that's there now) could be trimmed - there is a good source to the program, and it's linked. I'd say deleting the long list from the info box might be a good first step.(Einbildungskraft) (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed about the trimming. Perhaps instead of listing the characters in the infobox, it could say something like "Characters: 105"? (It's a sourced fact in the article that there are 105 characters.) Samsmachado (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense. I think you could type into the box: "* There are 105 characters"(Einbildungskraft) (talk) 17:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - we certainly don't need multiple lists - perhaps "There are 105 characters - see Characters section below" which can be linked and which directs the reader to the list? - Arjayay (talk) 19:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I like Arjayay's suggestion a lot. Anyone have any qualms with it? Samsmachado (talk) 23:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I like the look of that - good to have a sensible discussion and outcome for a change. Thanks both, and best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 08:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]