A fact from Hesper Mews appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that when built in the 1880s, London's Hesper Mews was home to servants, stables, and horses, but within a century it was populated by artists, military officers, and an Astronomer Royal?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
... that London's Hesper Mews has been home to artists, soldiers, an Astronomer Royal, and politicians? Source: Six notable people, each with a different source, all given in the article.
ALT1 ... that when built in the 1880s, London's Hesper Mews was home to servants, stables, and horses, but within a century it was populated by artists, military officers, and an Astronomer Royal? Philafrenzy (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good, promoted. DrSalvus 23:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Full review needed. Dr Salvus, if that was meant to be a review, it doesn't count; you need to address all the DYK criteria, from newness and length to the policy checks you made and what you found. As it stands, this is nowhere near adequate to count as a QPQ review. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Full review needed. Dr Salvus, if that was meant to be a review, it doesn't count; you need to address all the DYK criteria, from newness and length to the policy checks you made and what you found. As it stands, this is nowhere near adequate to count as a QPQ review. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: 
Done Dr Salvus (talk) 07:010, 7 November 2022 (UTC)