Talk:Heinz dilemma

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heinz dilemma article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about this moral predicament. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about this moral predicament at the Reference desk.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Where did the possible arguments (and their gradings) come from?[edit]

I am wondering if the 'possible arguments' and their gradings into the various stages came directly from Lawrence Kohlberg or they have been generated by others. I understand that the dilemma as it is presented comes directly from Kohlberg but from the way the article is written the source for the arguments is not clear. Would appreciate if this could be clarified, either in a response here or by edits to the article. Thanks Oska (talk) 00:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]