Talk:Hearst Tower (Manhattan)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• All images are free to use.
• Infobox and lead look good.
• In #Design, remove the comma after "George B. Post & Sons".
  • I split the sentence into two. Epicgenius (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• "set above from the second story" doesn't sound right. Reword.
  • Fixed. I meant to say "set back from" or "set back above" but something went wrong there. Epicgenius (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• "contain 13.5-foot" → "contains 13.5-foot"
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "part of the atrium".
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "British Construction Industry Award in 2007".
  • Done.
• Mark sources from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Done.
• New York Post is unreliable per WP:NYPOST.
  • Replaced or removed.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Thanks for the review. I have addressed all of the issues above. Epicgenius (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.