Talk:Hart–Fuller debate
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Philosophy[edit]
Somebody help me out with what these jokers were arguing about. I think I have a pretty decent stab at their statute interpretation viewpoints up there, but I'm sure it needs tidying.Phyrkrakr (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
This is very rough and contains a number of errors. The New York University Law Review had a whole special issue on the Hart-Fuller debate in 2009, and Peter Cane edited a book about it in 2010. Could someone with the time & expertise please help out with this entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.71.8.196 (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
I agree this page needs a lot of work. I'm doing my doctorate in legal philosophy, and a lot of it relates to Hart and Fuller, so I'm very familiar with the debate and with the secondary literature. I'm planning to do a pretty substantial rewrite in the next month or so. Hnye (talk) 20:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: First Year English Composition 1001[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 30 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kyle Uphus (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by RuthBenander (talk) 20:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)