Talk:Hans G. Adler

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hans G. Adler article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 20 May 2013 by reviewer SarahStierch (talk · contribs).

Hans G Adler Musicologist Musician Collector[edit]

Hi,

You have classified this article 'start" class. There is an editorial box at the beginning of the article and one at the end, suggesting additions. Since publication we have done major editorials, shrunk, rearranged, removed some intricate detail, and used more neutral language. Additional good references have been introduced and links and citations added.

It was our impression that this would affect and change the editorial boxes, so we have adopted a wait and see attitude. But there has been no change to it in the month since that work was done.

What procedure do we follow now?

Many thanks

Aldercraft (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wiki comment to this page is, I believe, no longer valid. A major editorial was made in May 2013, on issue, cutting out much of the extra detail in the article. There are now so many references and citations that it seems overloaded with them! Aldercraft (talk) 14:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to remove the article header. The page has been totally revamped from initial acceptance, intricate details removed, verifications added, articles linking to it included, and additional external links added, so it is redundant99.246.116.144 (talk) 15:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]