This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
While it is useful to have a list of the author's books, it's also important to include books & articles that are either a) about the subject (Galsworth) or b) about the field that she worked in. Did she inspire other scholars to research the fields that she wrote about? What did other scholars think of her work? Was it well-received or heavily criticized? Who were her critics and what did they say? It's important to include criticism, too, or the article could be dismissed as promotional.
For good or ill, Wikipedia values secondary sources (works written about Galsworth) more than primary sources (works written by Galsworth) because secondary sources are considered less biased. Think of it this way, an encyclopedia article about you would be quite different if it was written by a teacher or employer of yours versus what you would write about yourself. While your own thoughts about yourself would be valuable to a researcher, the evaluation by the teacher/employer would be more appropriate for an encyclopedia. LizRead!Talk! 21:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All the books seem to be self published too which makes notability even more problematic. Theroadislong (talk) 21:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
