Talk:Gunther E. Rothenberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGunther E. Rothenberg has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 6, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that military historian and Purdue professor Gunther E. Rothenberg escaped the Nazis and served in the British Army, the Israel Defense Force, and the US Air Force before attending college on the GI Bill?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gunther E. Rothenberg/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I'm assuming that the Villa de Madrid is a passenger ship of some sort, but can you clarify please?
    "Rothenberg completed with a bachelor's degree from" doesn't sound right to me. Maybe graduated or something similar instead of completed (or, this could just be a phrase I don't run into writing my Kaiserliche Marine articles ;)
    fixed.
    You should specify what his muzzle-loaders were. Many people would probably know what you're talking about, but many would not.
    I believe keynote is one word (the last paragraph in the Education & Career section).
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    This edit by another editor needs to be either sourced or removed (more than likely just reverted, given the peacock-ery going on there).
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    See the diff linked above.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Are there no pictures available? Since he passed away in 2004, a copyrighted photo of him would qualify for Fair Use. If you can't find a photo, that's no big deal though.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Excellent work on this article, Ruth. There are just a few things that need to be ironed out before I'll pass the article for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]